• CUBAN 2018 REPORT TO UN ON BLOCKADE
  • Why Cuba, Why Me?
  • Archive

Dizzy

  • Cuban Chronicles
  • About Walter
    • Why Cuba, Why Me?
    • More from Walter Lippmann
    • Photos by Walter Lippmann
    • A few things to think about…
    • About that “Other” Walter Lippmann
    • Privacy Policy
  • Translations
    • CubaDebate
    • CubaSi
    • Dr. Néstor García Iturbe
    • Esteban Morales
    • Frantz Fanon
    • Fidel Castro In His Own Words
    • Fidel Speeches Translations
    • Granma
    • Juventud Rebelde
    • La Jornada
    • Paquito
    • Manuel E. Yepe
    • Rebelión

August 3, 2018 1

NATO is a Gold Mine for the Arms Industry

7 years ago Manuel E. Yepeus foreign policy

NATO is a Gold Mine for the Arms Industry

Yepe

By Manuel E. Yepe

http://manuelyepe.wordpress.com/
Exclusive for the daily POR ESTO! of Merida, Mexico. 

Translated and edited by Walter Lippmann.

President Trump has ordered the NATO countries to increase their arms spending. The reasons for his insistence on doing so are becoming increasingly clear. It has nothing to do with any defense logic. After all, the Secretary-General of the US-NATO military alliance, Jens Stoltenberg, has admitted that “we do not see any imminent threat against a NATO ally”. Also, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute recorded in its 2018 World Report that “at $66.3 billion, Russia’s military spending in 2017 was 20% lower than in 2016”.

Radio Free Europe, the US government’s anti-Russian station, reports repeatedly that Russia has reduced its defense spending.

It has been proven that Russia poses no threat to any NATO country. But even this is considered irrelevant in the context that US arms sales are flourishing and those who carry it out are being encouraged to increase and multiply their business.

On July 12, the second and final day of the recent meeting between the United States and NATO, the British news agency Reuters issued a categorical statement with a clear promotional orientation from Trump: “The United States produces by far the best military equipment in the world: the best planes, the best missiles, the best weapons, the best of all.”

The president then listed by name the major U.S. arms manufacturers: Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman.

Trump proudly stated at the NATO conference that the United States has many rich countries as customers, “but we also have some not-so-rich countries and they ask me if they can buy US military equipment and if we can help them, and we tell them that we will help them a little. He added that “poorer countries that want to buy U.S. arms may not have to put cash into their purchases.

That single statement raised the prices of the shares of the three arms manufacturers named by Donald Trump and referred to in the previous paragraph by more than ten dollars.

The State Department, to boost the bonanza, made every effort to facilitate further U.S. arms sales by allowing arms manufacturers to bypass their checks and balances. These had been established to hamper the purchase of weapons from the United States by regimes considered to be of ill-repute in the world who want to buy weapons from the United States to put a fig leaf over some if some of its legal, moral and economic restrictions.

In fact, these regulations no longer apply. On July 13, the State Department announced new measures to “accelerate government approval of proposals from aerospace and defense companies,

Within European NATO, the biggest buyers of US arms are Poland, Romania, Great Britain and Greece, and the quantities involved are colossal.

The message to European NATO is that the US is making every effort to sell weapons and wants to make them see that there is scope to buy more of the “best jets, the best missiles, the best weapons” that Trump has to offer.

As journalist Brian Cloughley defined it on July 30th  on the Counterpunch and Strategic-Culture websites, “NATO’s gold mine is there to be exploited and, following Trump’s enthusiastic encouragement of the manufacturers of its weapons, it looks like the extraction will be effective. The U.S. Military Industrial Complex will benefit greatly from its President’s campaign to increase the number of weapons in the world.

Lieutenant General Charles Hooper, Director of the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency, told the Farnborough International Air Show on July 18 that “defense exports are good for our national security, good for our foreign policy… and good for our economic security. He then proposed that his agency reduce the transportation fees charged to foreign military customers, which would be an important stimulus to the sales of “the best jets, the best missiles, the best weapons” so highly valued by Mr. Trump.

This officer, obviously a devoted follower of his President, followed his line of action with dedication, reminding the media that as they have said “administration and our leadership, economic security is national security.”

August 2, 2018.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
 Subscribe to Blog via Email 

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 133 other subscribers
August 2018
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jul   Sep »
 Tags 
Cuban SocietyWomenUS SocietyCuba-US relationsCovid-19US politicspeopleLGBTblockadeFidel CastroCuban economymoviesviolenceVenezuelatourismus foreign policyDonald TrumpcoronavirustechnologyChinaBoliviaracismCuban FiveCuban PoliticsBlack strugglebioUS-Cuban relationsbooksMexicoRussiaCubamusicPalestine-IsraelSexGender ViolenceterrorismsubversionTrumpU.S. SocietyCuban healthBarack ObamaPCCArgentinaBidensports
 Meta 
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Privacy Policy

WL-Logo
 Fair use notice of copyrighted material: 
This site contains some copyrighted material that in some cases has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance the understanding of politics, human rights, the economy, democracy, and social justice issues related to Cuba. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
August 2018
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Jul   Sep »
2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 © Walter Lippmann
Touched by
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.